Arguing Public Diplomacy: The Role of Argument Formations in US Foreign Policy Rhetoric
Abstract:
Since 2002, US communication-based foreign policies have resulted in the launch of two high-profile international broadcasting stations — Radio Sawa and al-Hurra television — as well as other failed ventures such as the 'Shared Values' documentary campaign and the
Hi Arabic youth magazine. These policies have, at best, delivered mixed results as a form of public diplomacy for the United States. The principal objective of this article is to illuminate how governing beliefs about public diplomacy might have mitigated its success, by identifying the implicit policy imagination revealed in policy arguments. This article investigates the
discursive imagination behind US international broadcasting programmes and how public debate outlines an 'argument formation' for US foreign-policy rhetoric. Three episodes of policy argument between 2001 and 2005 are assessed as demonstrative of a rhetorically constructed policy imagination that prompted a broadcasting strategy that was incompatible with the communicative norms of its targeted foreign audience.
The requested document is freely available to subscribers. Users without a subscription can purchase this article.
- Sign in below if you have already registered for online access
- Permission to re-use this article via RightsLink
Register for online access if you are a personal subscriber to and want to set up online access
Visit IngentaConnect to activate access to an institutional subscription
Find out how to subscribe
Sign in
Article Access Options
The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.
$25.00
plus tax
Refund Policy
OR
Back to top